Where Has All The Money Gone?

When Arsenal released their financial results, we were just entering the first throws of a worldwide economic recession and the pound had not completely fallen through the floor. Arsenal’s balance sheet showed over £90 million in cash, before the summer transfer dealings, furthermore we were told in October 2008 that the club had sold over 90 of the 711 apartments generating £38 million in cash.

 

At the time and in fact in the annual report we were told that the loan on the Highbury Square development was ring-fenced from the club, assuming this was taken out by a subsidiary of the club

 

 “The bank facilities which the Group has used to fund the Highbury Square development

are ring-fenced from the financing of the football segment of the business. The final profits and cash to be released to the Club on completion of these property developments has not been budgeted by the Club and will be treated as a “bonus” when received –  accordingly, there is no commitment to use any such profits and cash at any specific time for any specific purpose.”

 

So looking at accounts subsequent statements, a fan would expect us to have in the region of £128 million in cash excluding anything generated since the start of the season. We were then led to believe by Danny Fizsmann that Wenger had whatever resources he needed to strengthen the squad. Arsene’s reluctance to use these “unlimited” resources led to people pointing the finger at Wenger and saying he is stubborn and will not spend any money.

 

Just before the transfer window opened, our beloved Chairman, Peter Hill-Wood said,

‘One has got to look ahead – in the future there is probably not going to be much more money coming in. We have got money, but I am not sure we are going to spend it. We’ve got to continue to run the business in a sensible way.”

 

At the end of November, the signals from Hill-Wood were slightly different, saying, “Absolutely. There have been suggestions that we keep stopping him from buying – that is not the case.”

He added, “He’s very sensible with the way he approaches the transfer market, he’s not going to buy anybody just because the press or fans say he should. He’s only going to buy somebody if he thinks they’re going to improve what is a young squad but a very talented one.

“He certainly has got money if he wants to spend it.”

 

So why the change in tone from Hill-Wood and why will the club not be honest and upfront with the fans?

 

Well the answer lies in the notes to the accounts. The club expected all the Highbury Square development flats to be completed and the aim was to sell the flats by summer 2009. This would have given rise to cash in the region of £200 million. This money would have been used to pay off the bank loan of £133.5 million that was used to build the flats. In the notes to the accounts, it states that this loan needs to be repaid in April 2010.

 

The club is clearly concerned that flats will not sell in sufficient number to generate the funds to repay the loan, and as such despite all the protestations of the board that the property enterprise will not affect the football club; clearly, this is not the case.

 

Once more Wenger has to cut his cloth short because we do not have the money, once more Wenger plays the dutiful employee and not say a word, whilst once more board hide behind Wenger and claim he has all the money needs.fans.

 

Advertisements

Posted on January 16, 2009, in Arsenal and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Hi Northbanklegend.. I have just started a blog with a few mates and was having a look around wordpress and thought I would have a peep as the finances of Arsenal are quite interesting.

    I keep hearing that we have £93 million pounds in the bank but I have found that we also need to repay a loan of £142,835 by the end of the season.
    Arsenal make around £40 million pounds profit a year and add that to the £93 and we still come up short of that repayment.
    The flats are mainly sold but we have only taken 10% deposits on them so there could be two problems with that.
    1 being if house prices fall by 10%, you could walk away from the deal and still not be worse off..
    2 being if house prices fall by 10% that means when it is time to borrow the money, the mortgage would be 100% of the total value property which as you know, they have been taken off the market.
    So i think things are okay but tight.
    Anyway if you ever want to pop over to ours you are very welcome buddy.
    ave

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: